Friday, July 18, 2014

35

I Was Thinking About Why We (Humans) Are Physically Attracted To Some People And My Thought Process Was Along These Lines, "The Reason We Find Some People Attractive Is Because We Unconsciously Want To Pass His Or Her Attractive Physical Traits On To Our Offspring. In Other Words, When We're Attracted To Someone We Unconsciously Reason That He Or She Will Most Likely Produce Offspring With The Physical Traits That We're Attracted To And That A Future Generation Of Mates Will Be Attracted To As Well, So We Want To Acquire Those Attractive Traits For Our Potential Offspring." The Same Goes For Personality Traits. When We Talk To Someone And Become Attracted To Them It's Because We Want Our Future Offspring To Inherit These Personality Traits That We Find Attractive. Essentially, Our Choice In Mates Comes Down To Who Can Produce Offspring With Traits That Will Lead To The Highest Reproductive Success. We're Unconsciously Seeking Mates With Those Genes That Will Lead To The Greatest Reproductive Success We Can Achieve (What Physical And Psychological Traits Will Attract Mates And Lead To High Reproductive Success). (I HAVE CHILDLIKE THOUGHTS! YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENED TO THOUGHT, RIGHT?)

Meta-analysis: The areas in which people most strongly chose mates who were similar to themselves were politics, religion, intelligence - and substance use. biorxiv.org/content/10.110

They Both Have Feminine, Paedomorphic Features. They Both Look Like Young Girls! 

"MOMMY DADDY FROM THE SAME HOOD!" - KILLA TWAN


"if husband has much higher level of education...separation is more than 70% higher...Relationships in which one partner smokes increased risk of separation...wife who drinks more than her husband is associated with 2/3 greater hazard of separation" geesh

Assortative mating, the tendency to choose mates who are similar to oneself, has been speeding up evolution in humans over the last 30,000 years. sciencedirect.com/science/articl
More career-oriented women were more likely to also prefer career-oriented, well-off male partners.
"genetic assortative mating may be speeding up evolution in humans"

"Assortative mating is far greater for intelligence (spouse correlations ~0.40) than for other behavioural traits such as personality (~0.10) or physical traits such as height and weight (~0.20)." nature.com/articles/mp201

Correlations between spouses Extraversion: r= .005 Neuroticism: .082 Height: .227 Weight: .154 Education: .5 Political party: .6 "Mates tend to be positively but weakly concordant on personality and physical traits, but concordance of political attitudes is extremely high"

"people tend to marry spouses with similar levels of education...exacerbating income inequality...Gender inequality in lecture halls has faded; household income inequality has widened."

Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first intercourse to substance use habits – partners were more likely than not to be similar.” colorado.edu/today/2023/08/
Do couples assort on personality? Yeah, a little bit. A lot for education, politics, and religion.

Meta-analysis: Partners in romantic relationships look similarly good. sciencedirect.com/science/articl Do people in opposite-sex romantic relationships have similar physical attractiveness, as reflected in self-reports and observations made by others? Do people who perceive themselves as physically attractive form romantic relationships with partners who are objectively similarly attractive? Using correlations gleaned from a prior meta-analysis of opposite-sex romantic couples, we performed a novel dyadic secondary meta-analysis to examine associations between men’s and women’s third-party observed and selfreported physical attractiveness in a dyadic context. Supporting an assortative mating account, both observed and self-reported physical attractiveness correlated positively within couples: More attractive people had partners who were more attractive, regardless of whether third-party observations or self-reports were considered. People who viewed themselves as more attractive also had partners who were more attractive. Second, observed and self-reported physical attractiveness were positively correlated for both men and women, implying that people were accurate in their judgments of others’ ratings of their own physical attractiveness, or alternately, people’s self-ratings were informed by the feedback they received from others about their physical attractiveness..

http://instagram.com/p/ktEfIum-Jc/?modal=true
HEY, THESE TWO LOOK THE SAME, HUH? THEY HAVE SIMILAR FACIAL FEATURES DON'T THEY? YEAH, THEY DO. IN FACT, THE ONLY MAJOR DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THEM IS THAT ONE IS WHITE WITH LONG, STRAIGHT HAIR AND THE OTHER IS BLACK WITH SHORT, COILED HAIR. OH, AND ONE HAS A LONGER, MORE NARROW FACE, WHILE THE OTHER HAS A SHORTER, ROUNDER FACE. BUT OTHER THAN THIS, THEY PRETTY MUCH LOOK THE SAME. READ THE CHAPTER ENTITLED "HOW WE PICK OUR MATES AND SEX PARTNERS" ON pg. 84* IN THE BOOK THE THIRD CHIMPANZEE WHICH IS LINKED BELOW (WE UNCONSCIOUSLY CHOOSE OUR MATES BASED ON THEIR PHYSICAL SIMILARITY TO US. IF YOU HAVE A LONG NOSE THERE'S A GOOD CHANCE THAT YOU'LL CHOOSE A MATE WITH A LONG NOSE, IF YOU A HAVE SQUARED JAWLINE THERE'S A GOOD CHANCE THAT YOU'LL CHOOSE A MATE WITH A SQUARED JAWLINE, ETC., ETC., ETC.). 

I'M A SQUARE!


http://instagram.com/p/vMXiyioDUP/?modal=true
THESE TWO LOOK SOMEWHAT SIMILAR, TOO, ESPECIALLY IN REGARD TO THE NOSE AND MOUTH AREA.  



20h20 hours ago
I can't believe senior year is almost over, but I'm so lucky to be spending it with my better half ❣️
SHE AND HER "BETTER HALF" LOOK PRETTY SIMILAR DON'T THEY? ALMOST LIKE BROTHER AND SISTER DON'T THEY? GENETIC SIMILARITY, JACC! GOOGLE THAT!

Despite the old notion that opposites attract, Indianapolis-based social psychologist Justin Lehmiller, who is a research fellow at the Kinsey Institute and author of Tell Me What You Wantsays people naturally gravitate toward people who are familiar, even though the whole process is likely subconscious. There are some traits that work best in a relationship when they’re balanced out by an opposing partner — like dominance and submissiveness — but, by and large, “what is familiar to us tends to be what we like and are drawn to,” even if we’re not explicitly aware of it, Lehmiller says.

That phenomenon extends to appearance. “You’re familiar with your own appearance, so seeing other people who share those similar sorts of traits might lead to more liking for that reason,” he says.

One 2013 study found that to be true. In the experiment, people were shown images of their romantic partner’s face that had been digitally altered to include some features from another face — either random other faces, or the study participant’s own face. Both male and female participants consistently rated the composite that included their own face as the most attractive.

An earlier study reached a similar finding about composite images — and also found that people were subliminally attracted to features of their opposite-sex parent. Study participants rated images of others as more attractive when a picture of their opposite-sex parent quickly flashed across the screen first, suggesting that they were subconsciously primed by the familiar face. Another 2018 study looking at biracial people found that they tended to be attracted to and pair up with people who resemble their parents, regardless of sex.

That parental preference may seem a little creepy, but it’s not problematic or even particularly surprising, Lehmiller says. It’s likely a completely subconscious process that taps into our natural associations with what’s pleasant and appealing, he says. “These traits might come to be seen as comforting,” he says. “They’re familiar to you.”

Contrary to the old saying “opposite attract,” you have probably noticed that romantic couples have a tendency to look more alike than they do different. But why is this the case? Is it because people have a tendency to select partners who look like them, or is it because couple members actually grow physically similar to one another over time? Surprisingly, psychologists have found support for both of these explanations.

Similarity in physical appearance is an important factor in initial attraction, and it is part of the reason couple members often look like each other right from the start. What appears to be driving this is a predisposition to select partners whose genes resemble our own. As some evidence of this, research has found that the spouses of identical twins are more similar to one another both physically and psychologically than are the spouses of fraternal twins [1]. Thus, the more genes that two people share in common, the more likely they are to look for similar characteristics in their partners. As additional evidence of this phenomenon, consider a study in which heterosexual participants rated the attractiveness of a set of faces [2]. Embedded in this series of images was an image of their own face that had been digitally morphed into the other sex. Despite not recognizing the morphed face as their own, participants rated it the most attractive of all. These and numerous other studies tell us that “like attracts like.”

However, what is even more fascinating than this is that romantic partners’ similarity to each other only grows over time! For instance, in a classic study by Bob Zajonc and colleagues, college undergraduates were asked to evaluate photographs of either newlywed couples or photos of the same couples after 25 years of marriage [3]. Specifically, participants saw images of two faces at a time and were asked to evaluate how similar each pair was and how likely they were to be married. Sometimes the pair that was presented was an actual married couple, and sometimes it was just two random people of similar age put together.

Results indicated that perceived facial similarity did indeed increase over time. Participants rated the faces of older married couples as being more similar than those of newlyweds and random pairs. Also, for young couples, participants could not distinguish between newlyweds and random pairs in terms of whether they were actually married; however, among older couples, participants were better at detecting which couples were married and which ones were not (presumably on the basis of those differences in facial resemblance). One other fascinating result is that the faces that were judged to be most similar belonged to the couples who reported being the happiest.

How do we explain this pattern of results? We cannot say for sure, but the authors argue that it is a function of empathy. The idea is that romantic partners frequently empathize with each other and “share” their emotional states. And sharing emotions means that we also share the same facial expressions, which may be the real key to increased physical similarity. That is, by moving their facial muscles the same way over time, romantic partners may come to have the same pattern of wrinkles around their mouths and eyes, among other things. Of course, other explanations are possible. For instance, increased resemblance could have something to do with residing in the same environment or having a similar diet.

And How About She And Her Hubby?! Pretty Similar, Wouldn't You Say?


http://api.ning.com/files/-YfYmyOcyZeEEJxjibM5GOx5*hC3CRFtXVvvdO-J8AHTILDjyUY-vSlZNVf01Ie1jRICu3xwpeIHVuVIuqrOHlaAQZ1-XkJ6/JaredDiamondTheRiseandFalloftheThirdChimpanzee.pdf

HOW WE PICK OUR MATES AND SEX PARTNERS pg. 84.
READ BELOW:

What about matching of husbands and wives for physical characteristics? The answer is not one that would leap out at you immediately if you just looked at a few married couples. That is because we do not select our own mates for their bodies as carefully as we select the mates of our show dogs, racehorses, and beef cattle. But we select nevertheless. If you measure enough couples, the answer that finally emerges is unexpectedly simple. On the average, spouses resemble each other slightly but significantly in almost every physical feature examined. That is true of all the obvious traits you would first think of when asked to design your ideal beloved — his or her height, weight, hair colour, eye colour, and skin colour — but it is also true of an astonishing variety of other traits that you probably would not have mentioned in your description of the perfect sex partner. Those other traits include ones as diverse as breadth of nose, length of ear lobe or middle finger, circumference of wrist, distance between eyes, and lung volume! Experimenters have made this finding for people as diverse as Poles in Poland, Americans in Michigan, and Africans in Chad. If you do not believe it, try noting eye colours (or measuring ear lobes) the next time you are at a dinner party with many couples, and then get your pocket calculator to give you the correlation coefficient. Coefficients for physical traits are on the average +0.2- not so high as for personality traits (+0.4) or religion (+0.9),but still significantly higher than zero. For a few physical traits the correlation is even higher than 0.2-for instance, an astonishing 0.61 for length of middle finger. At least unconsciously people care more about their spouse's middle finger length than about his or her hair colour and intelligence!  

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/we-know-your-genes-can-influence-your-health-but-can-they-also-influence-who-you-love-1272052/?no-ist
We Have Genes That Predispose Us To Be Attracted, Specifically On An Unconscious Level, To People That Have Different Genes Than Us (Particularly Genes That Create And Regulate Our Immune System; HLA Or Human Leukocyte Antigen). Why? Because Breeding With People Who Are Genetically Different Than Us Increases The Genetic Heterozygosity Of Our HLA System And Thus Gives Us The Genes To Create A More Robust Immune System Which Can Fight Off More Diseases.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/05/090525105435.htm
If You're Genetically And Biochemically Incompatible With A Potential Mate Your Potential Relationship With He Or She Won't Flourish Or Even Develop, For That Matter. If There's Too Much Genetic And Biochemical Conflict Between You And Your Potential Mate You'll Be Able To Detect It Unconsciously Through The Senses (Sight, Smell, Taste, Etc.), So Always Go With Your Gut Instincts.

Many kinds of animals are capable of what biologists call kin recognition. It tells them which members of their species to be nice to and which to be nasty to. A paper wasp, for instance, decides whether another paper wasp, seeking admission to the nest, is one of us or one of them by smelling it. If the newcomer smells like us, it is allowed to enter. Tiger salamanders can recognize their own siblings, also on the basis of smell. If you rear them among nonsiblings they often become cannibals. They don't mind eating other salamanders, but they'd rather not eat their own brothers and sisters. Kin recognition by means of odors is based on a biochemical mechanism similar to the one that permits your immune system to distinguish between "self" and "nonself".

Humans recognize kin, not on the basis of odors, but on the basis of familiarity. A sister or brother is someone you grew up with. People don't marry their sisters or brothers, not because it's against the law, but because they don't want to. Israelis who grew up in a kibbutz where boys and girls were reared together, treated like brothers and sisters, don't marry each other.

But people are nonetheless attracted to others who are similar to themselves. Husbands and wives are, on average, much more alike than they would be if Cupid fired off his arrows at random. The ways in which married couples tend to resemble each other include race, religion, socioeconomic class, IQ, education, attitudes, personality characteristics, height, breadth of nose, and distance between the eyes. Married couples don't come to look alike as they grow older: they look alike to begin with.

Similarity also serves as a basis for friendship. Even in nursery school, a child is attracted to others "like me." In grade school, children who are good friends are likely to be of the same age, sex, and race, and to have similar interests and values.

I believe the tendency to be drawn to people who are similar to yourself has its remote origins in kin recognition. If you were a hunter-gatherer, someone who looked like you and spoke your language was more likely to be a member of your group, possibly a relative, than someone who didn't look like you and spoke a language you couldn't understand. If you are an educated North American, you find yourself wanting to trust someone who looks like you, talks like you, and thinks like you.

The stranger is instinctively distrusted, by paper wasps and human babies, because he may be up to no good. If he is a cannibal - cannibalism is found in many species, including our own - he might eat you, because you are not his kin. The first reaction to the stranger, or to the one who is behaving strangely, is fear. Fear turns into hostility because being afraid is unpleasant. Remember the polio-stricken chimpanzee who dragged himself, crippled, back to his group? His groupmates reacted first with fear and then anger - they attacked him. Damn you for giving us such a fright!

We don't need a fancy cognitive explanation for hostility toward other groups - evolution provides a good one, and it works for animals as well as people. Group contrast effects, which exaggerate the differences between groups or create differences if there are none to begin with, are not (as far as I know) found in animals, but they are a direct consequence of the human and animal tendency to feel hostile toward other groups. If you fear and dislike someone, you are motivated to be as different from them as possible. Humans - adaptable creatures that they are - are ingenious at finding ways of being different from the members of other groups. (The Nurture Assumption)


https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/jp-rushton-race-evolution-behavior-unabridged-1997-edition.pdf
Read The Chapter On Genetic Similarity Theory (Starting On Page 75 Or 76). Pay Close Attention To How Genetic Similarity Relates To Your Spouse Or Potential Spouse (Boyfriends Or Girlfriends) And Your Peer Group (The People You Associate With). Opposites Don't Attract. Rather, Birds Of A Feather Flock Together (I Like People Who Look Like ME Or Look Like People That I'm Related To). ASSORTATIVE MATING. Jared Diamond Has A Chapter On This In His Book The Third Chimpanzee, Which I've Linked Below (How We Pick Our Mates and Sex Partners p. 84).

  1. People marry other people with similar intelligence to a greater extent than any other trait. Source:

No comments:

Post a Comment