ChecK This One Out. We've Got Black Polygyny (Polygamy), Black Adultery, Black Sexual Jealousy, And Black Mate Murder All Wrapped Into One Story!
THERE WAS A STORY ON INVESTIGATION DISCOVERY ABOUT A BLACK MAN WHO DID THE SAME EXACT THING AS THE WHITE MAN ABOVE. HE CREATED A FAKE PROSTITUTION PROFILE ON THE INTERNET FOR HIS EX-BLACK GIRLFRIEND BY USING HIS EX-BLACK GIRLFRIEND'S PHOTO, NAME, PHONE NUMBER, ADDRESS, ETC., WHICH LED TO HIS BLACK EX-GIRLFRIEND BEING HOUNDED BY MEN IN PUBLIC AND RECEIVING PHONE CALLS AND KNOCKS ON HER DOOR AT ALL HOURS OF THE DAY. I THOUGHT IT WAS BRILLIANT AND HILARIOUS WHEN I FIRST SAW IT. IF ANYONE KNOWS THE EXACT EPISODE FROM INVESTIGATION DISCOVERY THAT I'M TALKING ABOUT LET ME KNOW. (THEY COULD NEVER TRACK HIM BECAUSE HE WAS ALWAYS POSTING FROM PUBLIC COMPUTERS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY HE WAS LIVING IN!)
LOOK FOR IT HERE AND THEN LET ME KNOW IF YOU FIND IT.
HEY, ROSEANNA BAR, I'M WATCHING YOU AND THE REST OF THOSE LIBERALS ON THE VIEW RITE NOW AND I'M CERTAIN YOU'RE FOLLOWING ME ON THE INTERNET BECAUSE YOU'VE USED THE WORD "EXACTLY" SEVERAL TIMES IN A SHORT SPAN OF TIME. HEY, ROSEANNE BAR, YOU JUST SAID RAPE WAS NOT A CRIME OF SEX, BUT RATHER A CRIME OF POWER, i.e. A WAY FOR A MALE TO DEMONSTRATE HIS DOMINANCE AND POWER OVER A FEMALE. YOU ARE COMPLETELY WRONG, ROSEANNE. READ THIS LINK http://vengeanceizmine.blogspot.com/2014/10/ill-write-these-paiges-out-later.html TO UNDERSTAND WHY. HERE, I'LL GIVE YOU A HINT AS TO WHY. RAPE IS ADAPTIVE. IT SERVES AN EVOLUTIONARY PURPOSE AND WHAT'S THAT PURPOSE? PASSING ON ONE'S GENES.
Roseanne, Passages From Adrian "Tim Raines" Raine's Book The Anatomy of Violence Concerning RAPE (Wife Rape, In Particular) Are Soon Coming!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEE1hVeMU_U
This Finding Contradicts The Findings In The Passages Below (The Findings That Poor, Low Status Males Shunned By Females Are More Prone To Engage In Rape). Read The Passages Below. Then Cum In Find ME!
Is rape an act of hate? A malicious and derisory act against women condoned by a patriarchal society where men attempt to control and regulate their womenfolk? Or can this act of violence be partly explained by evolutionary psychology?
We can view the rape of a nonrelative as the ultimate genetic cheating strategy. Rather than striving to accrue resources to attract a female and investing years in the upbringing of their offspring, a male can cut through this tedious process in the twinkling of an eye. He just needs to rape a woman. Men have hundreds of millions of sperm that are always at the ready to inseminate a woman. The sex act is quick. And the male can immediately walk away, never to see that woman again. He knows that if pregnancy does occur, there is a decent chance that the female will care for their joint progeny. His selfish genes have reproduced.
How often will a rape result in a pregnancy? This was estimated in one study of 405 women aged twelve to forty-five who had suffered penile-vaginal rape. The total base rate was 6.42 percent, which was twice as high as the 3.1 percent base rate for unprotected penile vaginal intercourse in consensual couples. After correction for the use of contraceptive, the pregnancy base rate from rapes was estimated at 7.98 percent. The rates of pregnancies from rape can only be estimates because paternity is not investigated with definitive DNA evidence. Some women could "invent" a rape cover-up for an unwanted pregnancy. However, other studies have also reported higher rape-pregnancy rates than consensual-sex-pregnancy rates. It is nevertheless surprising. If we accept the findings, why would rape be more likely to result in a pregnancy?
One conceivable hypothesis is that rapists are more likely to inseminate fertile women. Rapists select their victims, and we certainly know that they are far more likely to select women at their peak reproductive age than other women. Furthermore, putting age aside, the possibility that a rapist may be more visibly drawn to women who are the most fertile is not impossible. Females with a smaller waist relative to their hips are viewed as more attractive in many cultures throughout the world. This smaller waist-to-hip ratio is also associated with increased fertility as well as better health. Consequently, male rapists could in theory select a more fertile female, consciously or subconsciously, based on how she looks.
Not all rapists choose victims they find attractive. It can even be the other way around. When I worked with prisoners in England, one rapist told me that he specifically picked out unattractive women to rape. Why would he do this? His argument was that an unattractive woman does not get enough sex, so it's okay to give her the sex that she really wants. This is just one example of a number of cognitive distortions that some rapists have. Their perverted belief is that women actually enjoy the act of rape and interpret it as the experience of a lifetime - their ultimate sexual fantasy come true.
#TRUE
Ideas like this may be inadvertently fueled by the fact that some women when raped actually achieve orgasm, even though they may strongly resist and are traumatized by the attack. True prevalence data are hard to come by because rape victims understandably are embarrassed to admit that they achieved orgasm during such a disgraceful violation. Clinical reports place the rate of the victim experiencing orgasm at about 5 to 6 percent, but clinicians also report that they suspect the true rate to be higher. This may well be the case, because research reports document that physiological arousal and lubrication occurs in 21 percent of all cases. Why would that happen? Because in half the cases, the date-raped woman was actually attracted to the perpetrator before the act. Orgasm and the associated contractions are thought to facilitate conception by contracting the cervix and rhythmically dipping it into the sperm pool. This admittedly has a modest effect, as sperm retention is increased by only approximately 5 percent with orgasm.
Clearly, conception does not require orgasm, so we cannot place too much weight on the physiological arousal of some women during rape as a prelude to pregnancy. Nevertheless, the fact remains that rapists generally select their victims and appear to consciously or subconsciously select more fertile women. This selection strategy would explain the purported increased pregnancy rate in rape victims and can be viewed in an evolutionary context. If a man is going to take risks rapping a woman, the strategy would be to pick the fertile one and enhance one's inclusive fitness.
There are, of course, risks associated with this particular cheating strategy. The male could suffer physical injury. Worse, he could be detected and beaten. Throughout much of human history rapists have been alienated or killed. In modern times he would be thrown into prison alongside psychopaths and murderers, where as a sex offender he is at risk for being beaten and raped himself. So evolutionary theory argues that there is a subconscious cost-benefit analysis at work - weighing the potential costs resulting from detection against the benefits of producing a child. Dominant men with resources can already attract mates, so one might expect that the cost-benefit analysis might tip the scales in favor of rape when the perpetrator has relatively fewer resources. In support of this prediction, rapists are indeed more likely than non-rapists to have lower socioeconomic status, to leave school at an earlier age, and to have unstable job histories in unskilled occupations.
...
But what about rapes that occur between partners in a marriage or other long-term relationship? Between 10 percent and 26 percent of women report being raped during their marriage. How can this be viewed through evolutionary lenses?
A great deal of research has documented that both physical and sexual violence perpetrated by men in a relationship is fueled by sexual jealousy. Infidelity is very distressing for both males and females, but men and women differ in terms of what causes these distressing feelings? Jealousy is the primary motive for a husband to kill his wife in 24 percent of cases, compared with only 7.7 percent of cases in which the wife kills her husband.
...
These findings on jealousy now render for us a perspective on why male sexual jealousy can fuel so much physical and sexual aggression in partner relationships. Men who force sex on their spouses are found to have higher levels of sexual jealousy than men who do not. Men may use violence as a mechanism to deter future defection by their female partner. A woman will think twice about having another dangerous liaison if it results in her being battered nearly to death.
Yet this gives us even more food for thought at the evolutionary dining table, where resources and reproduction are the vittles. Why would a male partner rape his female partner in response to an infidelity? You might say it's simply an act of revenge. But lurking under the surface of this social argument may be a deep-rooted evolutionary battle that influences violence and crime - sperm wars.
If a woman did have sex with another man, from an evolutionary standpoint her partner will want to inseminate her as quickly as possible. His sperm will then compete with sperm from the unknown rival in a battle to access the woman's egg. Furthermore, by getting his sperm into her reproductive tract at regular intervals during a potentially prolonged period of suspected sexual infidelity, he puts off the chance that any foreign sperm will be successful in getting to that prized egg. At regular intervals he can top off his sperm in her cervix by injecting 300 million warriors. Half of these will end up in a flow-back that comes out of the vagina and onto the bed sheets, while the rest have further work to do, beginning their arduous journey for the next few days toward the egg in competition with someone else's sperm.
In the genetic cheating game there's no stopping men. Women certainly have a hard time of it. They get raped by strangers. They get raped by friends. They get raped by their partners. Yet women are not always the victims. We'll see that they have their own subtle and conniving ways of waging war to promote their selfish genetic interests.
The Anatomy of Violence: The Biological Roots of Crime. Adrian "Makes It Rain, Let It Drip" Raine, p. 29-33.
"Hand Around Her Throat, Pullin' Her Hair, Slappin' Her Up Like A RAPIST Do It's Hankin' Everywhere!" - Mr. Free In Reference To Mr. Hanky Panky
The Evolutionary Theory of Rape 1
https://areomagazine.com/2017/11/29/evolution-rape-and-power-why-understanding-human-nature-matters/
"college men who admit to behavior that legally meets the definition of rape tend to be more popular, have higher status and have more consensual sex partners...men with money, status, popularity, and power are more likely to be sexual predators." amzn.to/3dIACe3
Rape may be defined as the use of force, or the threat to use force, to obtain sexual intercourse. Estimates of the number of women who have been raped vary, depending on how inclusive a definition the researcher has used. Some researchers use broad definitions that include instances in which a woman did not perceive that she was raped at the time but admitted later that she did not really want to have intercourse. Other researchers use stricter definitions that delimit rape to forced intercourse against the woman's will. One large-scale study of 2,016 university women, for example, found that 6 percent had been raped. Another study of 380 college women, however, found that almost 15 percent had been involved in sexual intercourse against their will. Given the tremendous social stigma attached to rape victims, these figures may underestimate the actual numbers of women who have been raped.
The issue of rape has a bearing on human mating strategies, in part because many rapes occur within the context of mating relationships. Dating is a common context for rape. One study found that almost 15 percent of college women had experienced unwanted sexual intercourse in the context of dating situations. Another study of 347 women found that 63 percent of all instances of sexual victimization were perpetrated by dates, lovers, husbands, or de facto partners. The most extensive study of rape in marriage found that of nearly a thousand married women, 14 percent had been raped by their husbands. It is clear that rape cannot be considered solely as a behavior perpetrated by strangers in dark alleys. It occurs in the context of other forms of mating activities and mating relationships.
As with sexual harassment, men are almost invariably the perpetrators and women are almost invariably the victims. These facts point to a continuity with other conflicts with the sexes. This continuity suggests that clues to understanding rape may be discovered within the mating strategies of men and women. The view that there is a continuity, however, does not imply that rape per se is an evolved strategy in men's sexual repertoire or was ever adaptive in human evolutionary history. Indeed it is a matter of controversy within evolutionary psychology today whether rape represents an evolved sexual strategy of men or is better understood as a horrifying side effect of men's general sexual strategy of seeking low-cost casual sex. The key issue is whether the evidence shows that rape is a distinct evolved strategy within the human arsenal of strategies, as it clearly is among some insect and bird species. Among scorpion flies, for example, the males have a special anatomical clamp that functions solely in the context of raping a female and not in normal mating, for which a male offers a nuptial gift. Experiments that seal the clamp with wax literally prevent the male from achieving a forced copulation.
Although men are not like scorpion flies, psychological and physiological experiments have revealed some disturbing findings. Laboratory studies that expose men to audio and visual depictions of rape versus mutually consenting sexual encounters find that men display sexual arousal, assessed both by self-report and by penile tumescence, to both consenting and nonconsenting situations. Men are apparently sexually aroused when exposed to sexual scenes, whether or not consent is involved, although other conditions, such as the presence of violence and a disgust reaction from the woman, appear to inhibit the sexual arousal of the men.
These findings, however, cannot differentiate between the two alternative possibilities: either that men have only a general tendency to be sexually aroused in response to witnessing sexual encounters and hence have no distinct adaptation to forced sex, or that men have evolved a distinct rape psychology. Consider a food analogy. Humans, like dogs, salivate when they smell or see appetizing food, especially if they have not eaten for a while. Suppose that a scientist hypothesized that humans have a specific adaptation to take food forcibly from others. The scientist then conducted studies in which people were deprived of food for twenty-four hours and thereafter were exposed visually to one of two scenes: appetizing food that was given willingly by one person to another person, or equally appetizing food that was forcibly taken from one person by another. If this hypothetical experiment yielded the result that people salivate an equal volume to both food scenes, we could not conclude that people have a distinct adaptation to "take food forcibly." All we could conclude is that, when hungry, people seem to salivate when exposed to scenes of food, regardless of the circumstances surrounding the form of procurement. The hypothetical example is analogous to the data that indicate sexual arousal in men in response to sexual scenes, regardless of whether those scenes depict mutually consenting sex or forced sex. The data do not constitute evidence that rape is a distinct evolved strategy of men.
Correspondences between rape and human mating strategies are found, however, in the profiles of rape victims. Despite the fact that some women of all ages are raped, the victims of rape are heavily concentrated among young women. In one study of 10,315 rape victims, women between the ages of sixteen and thirty-five were far more likely to be raped than women in any other age category. Eighty-fiver percent of all rape victims are less then thirty-six years old. By way of comparison, victims of other crimes, such as aggravated assault and murder, show a radically different age distribution. Women between forty and forty-nine, for example, are just as likely to suffer an aggravated assault as women between twenty and twenty-nine, but the older women are far less likely to be raped. Indeed, the age distribution of rape victims corresponds almost perfectly to the age distribution of women's reproductive value, in marked contrast to the age distribution of victims of other violent crimes. This evidence strongly suggests that rape is not independent of men's evolved sexual psychology.
Rape victims, like most individuals of male sexual desire, are by and large young and physically attractive. Men have evolved psychological mechanisms that respond with attraction and arousal to physical cues of youth and health, which are powerful determinants of standards of beauty. The fact that rapists also find these cues attractive and select their victims partly on the basis of them does not provide evidence of an evolved strategy in males for rape that is distinct from their strategy of casual uncommitted sex. The evidence simply provides further support for men's general desire for women who are young and attractive.
In the current state of knowledge, there is no direct evidence to suggest that men have evolved a distinct sexual strategy of rape. Rather, men seem to use force and violence to achieve a variety of goals. Because obtaining sexual access to young women is often one of these goals, some men employ force to achieve it, just as they use violence to vanquish rivals or steal other people's resources.
The suggestion that men use coercion of one form or another in a wide variety of sexual contexts, however, has considerable credibility. In attitude studies, men are more likely than women to see sexual coercion as acceptable. College women report that men often persevere to excess in their sexual requests, frequently initiate sexual advances even after the women say no, occasionally use verbal or physical threats, and sometimes use physical violence, such as slapping or hitting. One study of college women, for example, found that of those women who had been raped, 55 percent reported that the man did it even after she had said no; 14 percent used physical coercion, such as holding her down; and 5 percent used threats. Coercion is part of many sexual encounters.
The use of coercion by men is not limited to sexual encounters, however; men use coercion in a variety of contexts. Men coerce other men, perpetrate violence against other men, and kill other men four times as often as they kill women. Men are clearly the more coercive and violent sex and are responsible for most of the socially unacceptable, illegal, and repugnant behavior in the world. Coercion and violence may be weapons that men use in a wide range of interpersonal contexts, both sexual and nonsexual.
Feminist investigations have been critical in illuminating the abhorrence of rape from the victim's point of view. Contrary to what some men think, the evidence clearly shows that women do not want to be raped and do not experience rape as a sexual act. The psychological trauma experienced by rape victims - including rage, fear, self-loathing, humiliation, shame, and disgust - must surely rank among the most horrendous experiences anyone can suffer.
One important source of evidence about the evolutionary context of rape is studies that evaluate the psychological pain experienced by rape victims. The evolutionary biologists Nancy Thornhill and Randy Thornhill propose that psychological pain is an evolved mechanism that focuses an individual's attention on the events surrounding the pain, promoting the elimination and avoidance of the pain-causing events. In a study of 790 rape victims in Philadelphia, women of reproductive age were more severely traumatized by rape than either prepubescent girls or older women, as indicated by having trouble sleeping, suffering nightmares, being afraid of unknown men, and having a fear of being home alone. Because the intensity of psychological pain is presumably a function of the reproductive costs that ancestral women would have experienced as a result of a rape, a woman of reproductive age would have experienced rape as a more severe cost than pre- or postreproductive women with regard to such factors as the inability to choose the father of her offspring. The fact that women of reproductive age appear to experience more psychological pain supports the view that women have evolved mechanisms that are sensitive to their own reproductive condition to alert them to interference with their strategy of sexual selectivity. It also supports the view that sexual coercion may have been one of the recurring features of the ancestral social environment in which humans evolved.
Individual men differ in their proclivity toward rape. In one study, men were asked to imagine that they had the possibility of forcing sex on someone else against her will when there was no chance that they would get caught, no chance that anyone would find out, no risk of disease, and no possibility of damage to their reputation. In the study 35 percent indicated that there was some likelihood under these conditions, although in most cases the likelihood was slight. In another study, which used a similar method, 27 percent of the men indicated some likelihood if there was no chance of getting caught. Although these percentages are alarmingly high, they also indicate that most men are apparently not potential rapists.
Men who use coercion to get sex have been shown to exhibit a distinct set of characteristics. They tend to be hostile toward women, endorse the myth that women secretly want to be raped, and show a personality profile marked by impulsiveness, hostility, and hypermasculinity, combined with a high degree of sexual promiscuity. Studies of rapists show that they also have low self-esteem. Although no one knows what the origins are of the traits that make a man more prone to rape, one possibility is that the most sexually coercive men are low in desirability, as reflected in the fact that rapists have lower incomes and come disproportionately from the lower classes. Interviews with rapists support this view. One serial rapists, for example, reported that "I felt that my social station would make her reject me. And I didn't feel that I would be able to make this person. I didn't know how to go about meeting her....I took advantage of her fright and raped her." For men who lack the status, money, or other resources to attract women, coercion may represent a desperate alternative. Men scorned by women because they lack the qualities for attracting desirable mates may develop hostility toward women, an attitude that short circuits the normal empathic response and so promotes coercive sexual behavior.
In addition to personality, culture and context heavily influence the occurrence of rape. Among the Yanomamo, for example, kidnapping women from neighboring villages for mating purposes is considered an acceptable cultural practice. The hundreds of thousands of rapes that occur in war contexts, especially among those who are successfully conquering an enemy, suggest that rape occurs when the costs incurred by the rapist are generally minimal or absent. Perhaps by identifying and fostering conditions that inflict greater personal costs on perpetrators, the incidence of this terrible form of sexual conflict can be reduced.
Is rape an act of hate? A malicious and derisory act against women condoned by a patriarchal society where men attempt to control and regulate their womenfolk? Or can this act of violence be partly explained by evolutionary psychology?
We can view the rape of a nonrelative as the ultimate genetic cheating strategy. Rather than striving to accrue resources to attract a female and investing years in the upbringing of their offspring, a male can cut through this tedious process in the twinkling of an eye. He just needs to rape a woman. Men have hundreds of millions of sperm that are always at the ready to inseminate a woman. The sex act is quick. And the male can immediately walk away, never to see that woman again. He knows that if pregnancy does occur, there is a decent chance that the female will care for their joint progeny. His selfish genes have reproduced.
How often will a rape result in a pregnancy? This was estimated in one study of 405 women aged twelve to forty-five who had suffered penile-vaginal rape. The total base rate was 6.42 percent, which was twice as high as the 3.1 percent base rate for unprotected penile vaginal intercourse in consensual couples. After correction for the use of contraceptive, the pregnancy base rate from rapes was estimated at 7.98 percent. The rates of pregnancies from rape can only be estimates because paternity is not investigated with definitive DNA evidence. Some women could "invent" a rape cover-up for an unwanted pregnancy. However, other studies have also reported higher rape-pregnancy rates than consensual-sex-pregnancy rates. It is nevertheless surprising. If we accept the findings, why would rape be more likely to result in a pregnancy?
One conceivable hypothesis is that rapists are more likely to inseminate fertile women. Rapists select their victims, and we certainly know that they are far more likely to select women at their peak reproductive age than other women. Furthermore, putting age aside, the possibility that a rapist may be more visibly drawn to women who are the most fertile is not impossible. Females with a smaller waist relative to their hips are viewed as more attractive in many cultures throughout the world. This smaller waist-to-hip ratio is also associated with increased fertility as well as better health. Consequently, male rapists could in theory select a more fertile female, consciously or subconsciously, based on how she looks.
Not all rapists choose victims they find attractive. It can even be the other way around. When I worked with prisoners in England, one rapist told me that he specifically picked out unattractive women to rape. Why would he do this? His argument was that an unattractive woman does not get enough sex, so it's okay to give her the sex that she really wants. This is just one example of a number of cognitive distortions that some rapists have. Their perverted belief is that women actually enjoy the act of rape and interpret it as the experience of a lifetime - their ultimate sexual fantasy come true.
#TRUE
Ideas like this may be inadvertently fueled by the fact that some women when raped actually achieve orgasm, even though they may strongly resist and are traumatized by the attack. True prevalence data are hard to come by because rape victims understandably are embarrassed to admit that they achieved orgasm during such a disgraceful violation. Clinical reports place the rate of the victim experiencing orgasm at about 5 to 6 percent, but clinicians also report that they suspect the true rate to be higher. This may well be the case, because research reports document that physiological arousal and lubrication occurs in 21 percent of all cases. Why would that happen? Because in half the cases, the date-raped woman was actually attracted to the perpetrator before the act. Orgasm and the associated contractions are thought to facilitate conception by contracting the cervix and rhythmically dipping it into the sperm pool. This admittedly has a modest effect, as sperm retention is increased by only approximately 5 percent with orgasm.
Clearly, conception does not require orgasm, so we cannot place too much weight on the physiological arousal of some women during rape as a prelude to pregnancy. Nevertheless, the fact remains that rapists generally select their victims and appear to consciously or subconsciously select more fertile women. This selection strategy would explain the purported increased pregnancy rate in rape victims and can be viewed in an evolutionary context. If a man is going to take risks rapping a woman, the strategy would be to pick the fertile one and enhance one's inclusive fitness.
There are, of course, risks associated with this particular cheating strategy. The male could suffer physical injury. Worse, he could be detected and beaten. Throughout much of human history rapists have been alienated or killed. In modern times he would be thrown into prison alongside psychopaths and murderers, where as a sex offender he is at risk for being beaten and raped himself. So evolutionary theory argues that there is a subconscious cost-benefit analysis at work - weighing the potential costs resulting from detection against the benefits of producing a child. Dominant men with resources can already attract mates, so one might expect that the cost-benefit analysis might tip the scales in favor of rape when the perpetrator has relatively fewer resources. In support of this prediction, rapists are indeed more likely than non-rapists to have lower socioeconomic status, to leave school at an earlier age, and to have unstable job histories in unskilled occupations.
...
But what about rapes that occur between partners in a marriage or other long-term relationship? Between 10 percent and 26 percent of women report being raped during their marriage. How can this be viewed through evolutionary lenses?
A great deal of research has documented that both physical and sexual violence perpetrated by men in a relationship is fueled by sexual jealousy. Infidelity is very distressing for both males and females, but men and women differ in terms of what causes these distressing feelings? Jealousy is the primary motive for a husband to kill his wife in 24 percent of cases, compared with only 7.7 percent of cases in which the wife kills her husband.
...
These findings on jealousy now render for us a perspective on why male sexual jealousy can fuel so much physical and sexual aggression in partner relationships. Men who force sex on their spouses are found to have higher levels of sexual jealousy than men who do not. Men may use violence as a mechanism to deter future defection by their female partner. A woman will think twice about having another dangerous liaison if it results in her being battered nearly to death.
Yet this gives us even more food for thought at the evolutionary dining table, where resources and reproduction are the vittles. Why would a male partner rape his female partner in response to an infidelity? You might say it's simply an act of revenge. But lurking under the surface of this social argument may be a deep-rooted evolutionary battle that influences violence and crime - sperm wars.
If a woman did have sex with another man, from an evolutionary standpoint her partner will want to inseminate her as quickly as possible. His sperm will then compete with sperm from the unknown rival in a battle to access the woman's egg. Furthermore, by getting his sperm into her reproductive tract at regular intervals during a potentially prolonged period of suspected sexual infidelity, he puts off the chance that any foreign sperm will be successful in getting to that prized egg. At regular intervals he can top off his sperm in her cervix by injecting 300 million warriors. Half of these will end up in a flow-back that comes out of the vagina and onto the bed sheets, while the rest have further work to do, beginning their arduous journey for the next few days toward the egg in competition with someone else's sperm.
In the genetic cheating game there's no stopping men. Women certainly have a hard time of it. They get raped by strangers. They get raped by friends. They get raped by their partners. Yet women are not always the victims. We'll see that they have their own subtle and conniving ways of waging war to promote their selfish genetic interests.
The Anatomy of Violence: The Biological Roots of Crime. Adrian "Makes It Rain, Let It Drip" Raine, p. 29-33.
No comments:
Post a Comment