But who cares? It's only about sexual relationships, the main determinant of human happiness.
"TO BEGIN WITH THIS IS LANE WAY...ALL THE PHONES RING..." - MR. FREE
https://digest.bps.org.uk/2018/07/20/three-week-diary-study-sex-today-increases-sense-of-meaning-in-life-tomorrow/
"YOU DON'T TRULY CARE FOR ME OR LOVE ME. YOU'RE JUST TRYING TO GET SOMETHING FROM ME WHETHER THAT SOMETHING IS SEX, MONEY ($1), GOOD GENES, ATTENTION, AFFECTION, STATUS, A GOOD REPUTATION OR WHAT HAVE YOU". THAT'S HOW I VIEW ALL RELATIONSHIPS, ESPECIALLY THE MALE-FEMALE KIND.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201009/why-are-women-more-religious-men-i
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201009/why-are-women-more-religious-men-ii
http://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/smart-living/study-half-of-your-friends-don%E2%80%99t-consider-you-their-friend/ar-BBsOPXd
Ain't No Friend Of Mine!
Who'd have thought: "Poor mating performance" breeds unhappiness. and they don't mean having trouble getting it up. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886918305348 …
Geoffrey Miller Retweeted
Psychological theories of wellbeing have neglected the importance of sex. New study finds sex today is linked with greater sense of meaning in life on the next day https://digest.bps.org.uk/2018/07/20/three-week-diary-study-sex-today-increases-sense-of-meaning-in-life-tomorrow/ … My latest for @ResearchDigest
"YOU DON'T TRULY CARE FOR ME OR LOVE ME. YOU'RE JUST TRYING TO GET SOMETHING FROM ME WHETHER THAT SOMETHING IS SEX, MONEY ($1), GOOD GENES, ATTENTION, AFFECTION, STATUS, A GOOD REPUTATION OR WHAT HAVE YOU". THAT'S HOW I VIEW ALL RELATIONSHIPS, ESPECIALLY THE MALE-FEMALE KIND.
Edwin Luciano
1 year ago
I think Leonard Shlain was a very
intelligent man but I think many intelligent people make this mistake:
If religion came about because humans are frightened of death, and, as
he points out, men are more frightened of dying than women, one would
expect men to be more religious than women. It turns out there is a lot
of evidence to the contrary. Mind you, this error in no way takes away
from his argument that women want iron. (IRONWOOD)
The Contradiction Likely Stems From SEX Differences In Thought And
Behavior Between Men And Women. Men May Fear Dying More So Than Women
Because, On Average, Men Are Less Likely To Have Greater Reproductive Success Relative To Other Men Or At Least Reproduce. So This
Fear Of NOT Passing Their Genes Onto Subsequent Generations In Abundance
May Be The Unconscious Motivator Underlying Their Greater Fear Of Death
(They Want To Stay Alive So That They Can Continue To Breed Or At Least
Have A Chance To Breed). As For More Men Being Atheist Than Women, This
Is Just A Sexual Strategy Employed By Males To Attract Females.
Females, On Average, Are More Likely To Reproduce Than Males Because
They're The Choosers Of The Species (They Can Sit Back And Decide Who
They'll Allow To Impregnate Them). So There's Little Value In Them
Becoming An Atheist (There's No Need For Them To Adopt A
Countercultural, Nonconformist Outlook On Life That May Lead To Them
Being Excluded And Losing Support Among Friends And Family). Males, On
The Other Hand, Need To Take Chances To Gain Social Status And Standout
Among Other Males To Attract The Attention Of Females, So It Behooves
Them To Engage In Aggressive, Dominant, Risky Behavior. Adopting And
Espousing An Atheist Outlook On Life Is One Such Form Of Behavior. Atheism Is A Subversive Ideology (Contrary To
Mainstream Belief) And Allows A Sexually Competing Male To Standout From
The Pack And Attract The Opposite Sex (Pass On His Genes).
ON HOOVER
Replying to
Flipside's the majority of religious gurus & fanatics should also be men. Men should be more likely to be fiery heretics of all sorts. Male risk-taking propensity should confer greater tendency to both reject all religions & found new ones, to be Voltaire or Muhammad.
"Pascal had proposed that believing in God was a risk-avoidant strategy...risk-taking preferences might partly explain the gender differences in religiosity" https://bigthink.com/culture-religion/why-are-women-more-religious …?
Because most atheists are males, which entails a scarcity of like-minded mates, many are forced to marry religious women. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01494929.2017.1403989 …
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201009/why-are-women-more-religious-men-i
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201009/why-are-women-more-religious-men-ii
"Also men are more prone to creativity, because they are risk-takers and
instinctively love to break established dogmas and oppose to current
authority, because that is the best evolved strategy for climbing the
status ladder and showing off with women. Women instead are more
conservative and law abiding, because the best strategy for protecting
their child and be sure of being helped during the pregnancy is to not
break any taboo and to follow secure and already proven roads. This is
why even if women are as mathematically capable as men, their
discoveries or breakthroughs are much more rare than in men." - Freemen Muaddib
"He'd really have to do something wild to get my attention."
Males
Who Were Willing To Take Greater Risks And More Frequent Risks Whether
In The Form Of Verbally Disparaging Rivals, Engaging In Fights, Stalking
And Killing
Big Game, Stealing Goods, Luring Females From Their Male Mates, Etc.)
Had Higher Reproductive Success
In Our Evolutionary Past, So This Risk-Taking Nature Spread Amongst
Males And
Is Now A Trait That Characterizes All Modern Males. However, This
Risk-Taking Nature Comes With A Cost Because The Behavior And Psychology
Associated With This Risk-Taking Leads To A Shorter Lifespan. (This
Risk-Taking Behavior Tends To Peak In The Teens And Early To
Mid-Twenties When Males Are Trying To Establish Themselves And Climb The
Status Hierarchy Ladder. It Can Also Increase (The Frequency Of It)
When Males Are Down And Out And Have Nothing To Lose.)
People don't understand loyalty in this generation, too many temporary friendships & relationships.
HEY, LOW IQ, UNEDUCATED NIGGA/FLIPPA ONE'S SENSE OF LOYALTY IS MOSTLY A RESULT OF THEIR GENES (THEIR GENETIC TRAITS THAT INCLINE THEM TO BE LOYAL OR DISLOYAL). BUT ALL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN NON-GENETICALLY RELATED PEOPLE ARE BASED ON RECIPROCAL ALTRUISM (YOU SCRATCH MY BACK, I'LL SCRATCH YOURS), SO MOST OF THEM ARE BOUND TO DISSOLVE OVER TIME.
Friends. How Many Of Us Have Them?
Kinship is more about similar social groups, interests, geographical locations, whereas a friend, defined by Dunbar, is a person you can have a personal reciprocated relationship where you are willing to do each other favors.
http://thematinggrounds.com/how-to-be-attractive-to-women-pt-10-being-popular-matters-social-proof/
I Just Looked At Geoffrey's Site Today (03/09/15) For The First Time! I Need To Learn How To Do Some Of This Stuff That He Advises You Do To Attract Mates!
http://news.byu.edu/archive10-jul-relationships.aspx
I Need To Get Some And Get Some Fast. I Need To Get Some Friends Before I Die!
Kinship is more about similar social groups, interests, geographical locations, whereas a friend, defined by Dunbar, is a person you can have a personal reciprocated relationship where you are willing to do each other favors.
http://thematinggrounds.com/how-to-be-attractive-to-women-pt-10-being-popular-matters-social-proof/
I Just Looked At Geoffrey's Site Today (03/09/15) For The First Time! I Need To Learn How To Do Some Of This Stuff That He Advises You Do To Attract Mates!
http://news.byu.edu/archive10-jul-relationships.aspx
I Need To Get Some And Get Some Fast. I Need To Get Some Friends Before I Die!
Take A Picture Mitch! It Mite Make Ya Sicc!
http://www.newyorker.com/science/maria-konnikova/social-media-affect-math-dunbar-number-friendships?utm_source=tny&utm_campaign=generalsocial&utm_medium=twitter&mbid=social_twitter
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-squeaky-wheel/201504/why-your-old-friends-are-vital-your-future
"In The Park Lookin' Lonely...Fakez...Phoniez..." (Leimert Park)
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-squeaky-wheel/201504/why-your-old-friends-are-vital-your-future
"In The Park Lookin' Lonely...Fakez...Phoniez..." (Leimert Park)
http://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/smart-living/study-half-of-your-friends-don%E2%80%99t-consider-you-their-friend/ar-BBsOPXd
Ain't No Friend Of Mine!
So if your chick was suckin' some dude dick , then comin' home and tonguing you down in the mouth you'd be cool?!
HOW OLD IS THIS GIRL, MAN? I JOKINGLY WRITE STUFF LIKE THIS ON THE INTERNET (THERE'S NO SERIOUS INTENT WHEN I WRITE THE CRUDE SEXUAL JOKES I WRITE). BUT THERE SEEMS TO BE NO JOKING OR LACK OF SERIOUS INTENT WHEN SHE WRITES THIS STUFF. LIKE, THOUGHTS LIKE THAT ("So if your chick was suckin' some dude dick...") REALLY CONCERN HER AND PREOCCUPY HER MIND? THESE ARE SERIOUS ISSUES TO HER? HOW OLD IS SHE? CUZ, LIKE, JUNIOR HIGH KIDS THINK AND TALK ABOUT THAT STUFF? OH, WAIT, SHE'S BLACK AND FILIPINO AND BLACKS HAVE THE MENTAL AGE OF 12 YEAR OLDS AND FILIPINOS HAVE THE MENTAL AGE OF 14 YEAR OLDS. SO WHAT SHE WRITES (THINKS AND SAYS) IS ABOUT RIGHT FOR HER 13 YEAR OLD MENTAL AGE.
I'm Not Very Aggressive Or Assertive With Females. I Don't Take The Initiative With Them. Instead, I'm Somewhat Passive With Them And When I Do Interact With Them I'm Not Very Soft, Sweet, Tender, And Emotional. So I Lose Them. (I've Appealed To Many Females And Many Females Have Liked ME, But I've Been Unable To Capitalize On This Attraction.)
Another explanation holds that knowledge hurts, because it confronts us with the imperfections of this world and our-self. In this view ignorance is bliss...A more plausible explanation would seem to be that the cultivation of school-intelligence involves costs. These costs can be in hours spent in school, not spent on sports or socializing and thus in underdevelopment of other capabilities required to lead a satisfying life...
I SPENT SO MUCH TIME AND EFFORT DEVELOPING MY BASKETBALL GAME AS WELL AS CONCENTRATING ON ACADEMICS DURING MY CHILDHOOD AND TEENAGE YEARS THAT I NEVER REALLY PUT MUCH TIME INTO DEVELOPING COURTING SKILLS (THE ABILITY TO COURT FEMALES). AS A MATTER OF FACT, I WASN'T INTERESTED IN COURTING FEMALES AT THAT TIME, SO I NEVER REALLY SPOKE TO FEMALES AT THIS TIME IN MY LIFE AND IF I DID IT WAS IN A BUSINESS LIKE MANNER (JUST TO GET INFORMATION, NOT TO GET EMOTIONAL). (ACTUALLY, I THINK MY RELIGIOUS UPBRINGING PLAYED THE BIGGEST ROLE IN MY LACK OF RELATIONSHIPS WITH FEMALES! THE SEXUAL REPRESSION AND SEXUAL GUILT BROUGHT ABOUT BY CATHOLIC INDOCTRINATION PREVENTED ME FROM DEVELOPING A HEALTHY SEXUAL PSYCHOLOGY AND MALE-FEMALE RELATIONSHIPS!)
https://plus.google.com/101046916407340625977/posts/3ESd9KSBH6Z
Another explanation holds that knowledge hurts, because it confronts us with the imperfections of this world and our-self. In this view ignorance is bliss...A more plausible explanation would seem to be that the cultivation of school-intelligence involves costs. These costs can be in hours spent in school, not spent on sports or socializing and thus in underdevelopment of other capabilities required to lead a satisfying life...
I SPENT SO MUCH TIME AND EFFORT DEVELOPING MY BASKETBALL GAME AS WELL AS CONCENTRATING ON ACADEMICS DURING MY CHILDHOOD AND TEENAGE YEARS THAT I NEVER REALLY PUT MUCH TIME INTO DEVELOPING COURTING SKILLS (THE ABILITY TO COURT FEMALES). AS A MATTER OF FACT, I WASN'T INTERESTED IN COURTING FEMALES AT THAT TIME, SO I NEVER REALLY SPOKE TO FEMALES AT THIS TIME IN MY LIFE AND IF I DID IT WAS IN A BUSINESS LIKE MANNER (JUST TO GET INFORMATION, NOT TO GET EMOTIONAL). (ACTUALLY, I THINK MY RELIGIOUS UPBRINGING PLAYED THE BIGGEST ROLE IN MY LACK OF RELATIONSHIPS WITH FEMALES! THE SEXUAL REPRESSION AND SEXUAL GUILT BROUGHT ABOUT BY CATHOLIC INDOCTRINATION PREVENTED ME FROM DEVELOPING A HEALTHY SEXUAL PSYCHOLOGY AND MALE-FEMALE RELATIONSHIPS!)
https://plus.google.com/101046916407340625977/posts/3ESd9KSBH6Z