Friday, January 9, 2015

Twenty

‏Verified ac@primalpolyJun 22
But who cares? It's only about sexual relationships, the main determinant of human happiness.

I HAD A THOUGHT A FEW WEEKS AGO AND THE THOUGHT WAS THIS: "IF I HAD DEVELOPED A RELATIONSHIP WITH A FEMALE EARLY IN MY LIFE (MAYBE HIGH SCHOOL OR COLLEGE) AND IF I HAD CONTINUED TO DEVELOP RELATIONSHIPS WITH FEMALES OVER THE YEARS MY BELIEFS AND OUTLOOK ON LIFE WOULD PROBABLY BE MUCH MORE DIFFERENT. THE FACT THAT I'VE NEVER HAD A LONG-TERM RELATIONSHIP WITH A FEMALE (A BOYFRIEND-GIRLFRIEND RELATIONSHIP) HAS AFFECTED EVERY ASPECT OF MY LIFE, ESPECIALLY MY PERSONALITY AND IDEOLOGY." IN OTHER WORDS, MY LACK OF RELATIONSHIPS WITH THE OPPOSITE SEX HAS LIKELY PLAYED A LARGE ROLE IN ME BEING AN ATHEIST AND ME BEING PESSIMISTIC, SUSPICIOUS, CYNICAL, SKEPTICAL, AND, CRITICAL OF THE HUMAN RACE AND HUMAN RELATIONSHIPS (PARTICULARLY MALE-FEMALE RELATIONSHIPS). (INTIMATE, SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH THE OPPOSITE SEX ARE SO ESSENTIAL TO YOUR PSYCHOLOGICAL AND EMOTIONAL WELL BEING THAT A LACK OF THESE RELATIONSHIPS CAN FUCK UP JUST ABOUT EVERY PART OF YOUR LIFE. OR MAYBE I'M JUST FUCKED UP TO BEGIN WITH AND THUS AN INNATELY PESSIMISTIC, SUSPICIOUS, CYNICAL, SKEPTICAL, AND CRITICAL PERSON TO BEGIN WITH. WHO KNOWS).
 
"TO BEGIN WITH THIS IS LANE WAY...ALL THE PHONES RING..." - MR. FREE

 Oct 9
Who'd have thought: "Poor mating performance" breeds unhappiness. and they don't mean having trouble getting it up.
  Retweeted
 Jul 23
Psychological theories of wellbeing have neglected the importance of sex. New study finds sex today is linked with greater sense of meaning in life on the next day My latest for
https://digest.bps.org.uk/2018/07/20/three-week-diary-study-sex-today-increases-sense-of-meaning-in-life-tomorrow/

 "YOU DON'T TRULY CARE FOR ME OR LOVE ME. YOU'RE JUST TRYING TO GET SOMETHING FROM ME WHETHER THAT SOMETHING IS SEX, MONEY ($1), GOOD GENES, ATTENTION, AFFECTION, STATUS, A GOOD REPUTATION OR WHAT HAVE YOU". THAT'S HOW I VIEW ALL RELATIONSHIPS, ESPECIALLY THE MALE-FEMALE KIND. 
Edwin Luciano 1 year ago
I think Leonard Shlain was a very intelligent man but I think many intelligent people make this mistake: If religion came about because humans are frightened of death, and, as he points out, men are more frightened of dying than women, one would expect men to be more religious than women. It turns out there is a lot of evidence to the contrary. Mind you, this error in no way takes away from his argument that women want iron. (IRONWOOD)

The Contradiction Likely Stems From SEX Differences In Thought And Behavior Between Men And Women. Men May Fear Dying More So Than Women Because, On Average, Men Are Less Likely To Have Greater Reproductive Success Relative To Other Men Or At Least Reproduce. So This Fear Of NOT Passing Their Genes Onto Subsequent Generations In Abundance May Be The Unconscious Motivator Underlying Their Greater Fear Of Death (They Want To Stay Alive So That They Can Continue To Breed Or At Least Have A Chance To Breed). As For More Men Being Atheist Than Women, This Is Just A Sexual Strategy Employed By Males To Attract Females. Females, On Average, Are More Likely To Reproduce Than Males Because They're The Choosers Of The Species (They Can Sit Back And Decide Who They'll Allow To Impregnate Them). So There's Little Value In Them Becoming An Atheist (There's No Need For Them To Adopt A Countercultural, Nonconformist Outlook On Life That May Lead To Them Being Excluded And Losing Support Among Friends And Family). Males, On The Other Hand, Need To Take Chances To Gain Social Status And Standout Among Other Males To Attract The Attention Of Females, So It Behooves Them To Engage In Aggressive, Dominant, Risky Behavior. Adopting And Espousing An Atheist Outlook On Life Is One Such Form Of Behavior. Atheism Is A Subversive Ideology (Contrary To Mainstream Belief) And Allows A Sexually Competing Male To Standout From The Pack And Attract The Opposite Sex (Pass On His Genes).

ON HOOVER 
 
Ian
@IanAdAstra
Replying to
@DegenRolf
Flipside's the majority of religious gurus & fanatics should also be men. Men should be more likely to be fiery heretics of all sorts. Male risk-taking propensity should confer greater tendency to both reject all religions & found new ones, to be Voltaire or Muhammad.
Ian
@IanAdAstra
Perhaps Robert Ingersoll would be a better example of a male Atheist. My favorite Atheist is Jean Mesier. Imagine a seemingly devout Catholic priest hoding mass & ministering to the poor in live, while leaving a firebrand Atheist screed for posterity: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Mesl
  1. Jan 18 
    2. "Pascal had proposed that believing in God was a risk-avoidant strategy...risk-taking preferences might partly explain the gender differences in religiosity" ?

"Also men are more prone to creativity, because they are risk-takers and instinctively love to break established dogmas and oppose to current authority, because that is the best evolved strategy for climbing the status ladder and showing off with women. Women instead are more conservative and law abiding, because the best strategy for protecting their child and be sure of being helped during the pregnancy is to not break any taboo and to follow secure and already proven roads. This is why even if women are as mathematically capable as men, their discoveries or breakthroughs are much more rare than in men." - Freemen Muaddib
 
"He'd really have to do something wild to get my attention."
Males Who Were Willing To Take Greater Risks And More Frequent Risks Whether In The Form Of Verbally Disparaging Rivals, Engaging In Fights, Stalking And Killing Big Game, Stealing Goods,  Luring Females From Their Male Mates, Etc.) Had Higher Reproductive Success In Our Evolutionary Past, So This Risk-Taking Nature Spread Amongst Males And Is Now A Trait That Characterizes All Modern Males. However, This Risk-Taking Nature Comes With A Cost Because The Behavior And Psychology Associated With This Risk-Taking Leads To A Shorter Lifespan. (This Risk-Taking Behavior Tends To Peak In The Teens And Early To Mid-Twenties When Males Are Trying To Establish Themselves And Climb The Status Hierarchy Ladder. It Can Also Increase (The Frequency Of It) When Males Are Down And Out And Have Nothing To Lose.)

 ·  20h 20 hours ago
People don't understand loyalty in this generation, too many temporary friendships & relationships.
HEY, LOW IQ, UNEDUCATED NIGGA/FLIPPA ONE'S SENSE OF LOYALTY IS MOSTLY A RESULT OF THEIR GENES (THEIR GENETIC TRAITS THAT INCLINE THEM TO BE LOYAL OR DISLOYAL). BUT ALL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN NON-GENETICALLY RELATED PEOPLE ARE BASED ON RECIPROCAL ALTRUISM (YOU SCRATCH MY BACK, I'LL SCRATCH YOURS), SO MOST OF THEM ARE BOUND TO DISSOLVE OVER TIME.

 Apr 18Austin, TX
Hard for a shy anxious person like me
Hmmm. You need to make a continued effort to make friends in your adult life

Friends. How Many Of Us Have Them?
Kinship is more about similar social groups, interests, geographical locations, whereas a friend, defined by Dunbar, is a person you can have a personal reciprocated relationship where you are willing to do each other favors.
http://thematinggrounds.com/how-to-be-attractive-to-women-pt-10-being-popular-matters-social-proof/
I Just Looked At Geoffrey's Site Today (03/09/15) For The First Time! I Need To Learn How To Do Some Of This Stuff That He Advises You Do To Attract Mates!
http://news.byu.edu/archive10-jul-relationships.aspx
I Need To Get Some And Get Some Fast. I Need To Get Some Friends Before I Die!
Take A Picture Mitch! It Mite Make Ya Sicc!
 ·  21h 21 hours ago
So if your chick was suckin' some dude dick , then comin' home and tonguing you down in the mouth you'd be cool?! 
HOW OLD IS THIS GIRL, MAN? I JOKINGLY WRITE STUFF LIKE THIS ON THE INTERNET (THERE'S NO SERIOUS INTENT WHEN I WRITE THE CRUDE SEXUAL JOKES I WRITE). BUT THERE SEEMS TO BE NO JOKING OR LACK OF SERIOUS INTENT WHEN SHE WRITES THIS STUFF. LIKE, THOUGHTS LIKE THAT ("So if your chick was suckin' some dude dick...") REALLY CONCERN HER AND PREOCCUPY HER MIND? THESE ARE SERIOUS ISSUES TO HER? HOW OLD IS SHE? CUZ, LIKE, JUNIOR HIGH KIDS THINK AND TALK ABOUT THAT STUFF? OH, WAIT, SHE'S BLACK AND FILIPINO AND BLACKS HAVE THE MENTAL AGE OF 12 YEAR OLDS AND FILIPINOS HAVE THE MENTAL AGE OF 14 YEAR OLDS. SO WHAT SHE WRITES (THINKS AND SAYS) IS ABOUT RIGHT FOR HER 13 YEAR OLD MENTAL AGE.

David Schmitt
@PsychoSchmitt
"A happiness booster from having sex once a week can potentially feel like the feel-good you’d get from earning an extra $50,000 a year! But there are also many good reasons why a lot of sex may not make us happy."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMRWgN3kvgw
I'M UNHAPPY

 Hi, Omar, Mr. Saad Isn't Here To Answer Your Questions, So I'll Do So For Him! Number 1: Sex Is Highly Rewarding On A Personal And Social Level. Having Sex Has Psychological, Biological, And Social Benefits. For Example, Sex, Especially With An Attractive, Highly Regarded Mate, Makes You Feel Good About Yourself (Increases Self-Worth), Boosts Your Confidence, And Increases Your Overall Mental And Physical Well-Being, In Addition To Boosting Your Status Amongst Your Peer Group, And These Reasons Greatly Outweigh Any Social Or Emotional Or Biological Costs That May Come From Seeking Sex And Having Sex. Number 2: No, Sex Will Not Become Obsolete In The Future. We Evolved To Have Sex With Other Members Of Our Species At All Costs (We Have Genes That Wire Us To Do This), So As Long As We Continue To Have Sex With Other Members Of Our Species And Produce Children Who Inherit This Same Drive (The Drive To Have Sex With Members Of Our Species), Sex Will Not Become Obsolete*. Number 3: Cultural Evolution And Genetic Evolution Are Often At Odds With One Another. They Contradict And Conflict With One Another Because One (Cultural Evolution) Is Evolving Much Quicker Than The Other (Genetic Evolution) And Going In A Direction In Which The Other Is Not Yet Ready To Go. For Instance, Humans Evolved Genes That Drive Them To Seek Sex With Other Humans For The Physical Pleasure That They Derive From It. However, We Now Live In A Culturally Advanced Time In Which Technological Devices Can Take The Place Of Humans And Provide The Physical Pleasure Of Sex That, In Our Evolutionary Past, Was Only Provided Through Human To Human Sex (Or At Least Hand To Human Sex). But There's A Cost To This Technological (Cultural) Advance And It's The Loss Of Emotional Satisfaction And Psychological Well-Being That Comes From Having Sex With Machines. You See, Cultural Evolution Has Created Technology That Appeals To And Stimulates Our Evolved (Genetic) Desires, But It Often Takes A Physical And Psychological Toll On Us Because We're Not Yet Genetically Adapted To This New Technology! So, Yes, Cultural Evolution Is Both A Gift And A Curse!

*We Evolved To Have Intimate, Sexual Relationships With Sensual, Sexual, Sensitive (Responsive) Members Of Our Species And No Pill Or Brain/Reproductive Organ Stimulating Machine Will Ever Replace This. Yes, A Machine That Stimulates Your Sexual Organ May Physically Satisfy You (Just Like Masturbating With Your Hand Can Satisfy You), But The Emotional Satisfaction And Potential To Produce A Child That Sex With A Human Being Brings Can Never Be Replaced Or Mimicked By A Machine. And Those Are 2 Major Components Of Sex That Humans Have Evolved To Desire (The Emotional Satisfaction Of Having Sex With Another Human And The Reproductive Possibility Of Having Sex With Another Human).
I'm Not Very Aggressive Or Assertive With Females. I Don't Take The Initiative With Them. Instead, I'm Somewhat Passive With Them And When I Do Interact With Them I'm Not Very Soft, Sweet, Tender, And Emotional. So I Lose Them. (I've Appealed To Many Females And Many Females Have Liked ME, But I've Been Unable To Capitalize On This Attraction.)


Another explanation holds that knowledge hurts, because it confronts us with the imperfections of this world and our-self. In this view ignorance is bliss...A more plausible explanation would seem to be that the cultivation of school-intelligence involves costs. These costs can be in hours spent in school, not spent on sports or socializing and thus in underdevelopment of other capabilities required to lead a satisfying life...

I SPENT SO MUCH TIME AND EFFORT DEVELOPING MY BASKETBALL GAME AS WELL AS CONCENTRATING ON ACADEMICS DURING MY CHILDHOOD AND TEENAGE YEARS THAT I NEVER REALLY PUT MUCH TIME INTO DEVELOPING COURTING SKILLS (THE ABILITY TO COURT FEMALES). AS A MATTER OF FACT, I WASN'T INTERESTED IN COURTING FEMALES AT THAT TIME, SO I NEVER REALLY SPOKE TO FEMALES AT THIS TIME IN MY LIFE AND IF I DID IT WAS IN A BUSINESS LIKE MANNER (JUST TO GET INFORMATION, NOT TO GET EMOTIONAL). (ACTUALLY, I THINK MY RELIGIOUS UPBRINGING PLAYED THE BIGGEST ROLE IN MY LACK OF RELATIONSHIPS WITH FEMALES! THE SEXUAL REPRESSION AND SEXUAL GUILT BROUGHT ABOUT BY CATHOLIC INDOCTRINATION PREVENTED ME FROM DEVELOPING A HEALTHY SEXUAL PSYCHOLOGY AND MALE-FEMALE RELATIONSHIPS!)
https://plus.google.com/101046916407340625977/posts/3ESd9KSBH6Z
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)